Economic Analysis of Appomattox River Water Authority’s 10-Year Capital Planning Program
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67bfb/67bfb7e607e2112c98f2d807056deba74bc851ab" alt=""
Hazen and Sawyer’s key tasks were to: (1) Develop and run a financial model for evaluating the 10-year CPP; (2) Identify “equitable and reasonable” principles for allocating CPP capital and O&M costs among the five shareholder jurisdictions and estimate wholesale price impacts to each of those jurisdictions; and (3) Evaluate alternative financing methods including establishing of a reserve fund to determine impact on wholesale water rates over the planning period.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8598f/8598f22d98f03583bb837cb62b13bac75c4f398d" alt="Alan Karnovitz, MPP"
Alan Karnovitz serves as Group Leader for Hazen’s Economic and Financial Services Group.
Related Topics:
Project Outcomes and Benefits
- Our financial evaluation allowed the Authority to fully consider the financial impacts of a broad array of CPP project configurations and alternative cost allocation methods to better optimize its decision process.
- Financial evaluation, based on recommendations of the engineering study, determined that the Authority would be better served by deferring the addition of a new transmission line for at least 10 years, reducing the net present value of debt service cost by about $3.5 million over the CPP planning period.